Dashboard · Performance · Strategy Scouting Report

Cash 4 High-Conviction Consensus (≥ 2 Agreement)

Dynamic Walk-Forward 174 total plays 0.2 families/draw

Selective consensus sniper: wagers ONLY on families recommended by at least 2 independent 4-digit quantitative engines, weighted by empirical engine hit accuracy.

🧠 How this strategy works

Methodology & Selection Logic

Selective consensus sniper: wagers ONLY on families recommended by at least 2 independent 4-digit quantitative engines, weighted by empirical engine hit accuracy.

Execution & Cost Profile

  • Play Sizing: Averages 0.2 boxed families per drawing.
  • Cost per Active Draw: ~$0.06 (0.2 × $0.25).
  • Settlement: Every play is settled against actual historical drawings without lookahead bias.
  • Trigger Behavior: Re-evaluated before every drawing based strictly on past occurrences.

🎯 Next draw plays — Midday · 09/10/2026

No plays scheduled for Midday · 09/10/2026. No multi-engine consensus found for this drawing — disciplined sit-out.

⚡ STRATEGY EFFICIENCY & CAPITAL OPTIMIZATION TERMINAL Efficiency Grade: B Archetype: REGIME SPECIALIST
Ticket Waste Index: 0%

Quantitative Diagnostic: Moderate Efficiency: Breakeven equilibrium; capital preserved with reduced downside exposure.

Dimension / Metric Standard Baseline ⚡ High-Efficiency Optimized Variance & Capital Lift
Total Plays Placed 0 0 -0% wagers eliminated
Winning Hits Captured 0 0 100% hits retained
Hit Rate Efficiency 0.00% 0.00% +0.00%
Capital Invested $0.00 $0.00 +$0.00 saved
Net Profit / Loss +$0.00 +$0.00 +$0.00 turnaround
Return on Investment (ROI) 0.0% 0.0% +0.0% ROI Lift
🛡️ Tailored Optimization Rules Applied to this Model
Top-K Concentration: Capped at top lines to eliminate dilution
Anti-Repeat Shield: 15-draw trailing blackout (< 0.08% repeat rate)
Wave Sizing & Trough Protection: $0.50 Wave 1 / $0.00 Dead Zone (Draws 4–6)
Draw 10 Zero Exposure Mandate: 🛑 $0.00 Sit Out on Step 10 (Terminal Hard-Stop)

📊 Key performance metrics (1 year walk-forward)

★ Sweet Spot Window

Evaluated across 732 drawings (2025-09-09 → 2026-09-09). Multi-year consistency benchmark: $-3 (-3.6% ROI across 335 all-time draws).

Net Profit -$43.5
Return on Investment -100.0%
Hit Rate 0.00%
Max Drawdown -$-43.5
Active Drawings 732
Total Plays Placed 174
Total Winning Hits 0
Gross Revenue $0

💼 Bankroll & Staking Simulator

Test how this strategy would have performed with different stake sizes and starting bankrolls, based on the actual historical walk-forward results.

Total Staked (Cost) $43.5
Total Payout (Gross) $0
Net Profit / Loss -$43.5
Final Bankroll $456.5
Max historical drawdown scaled to selected stake: -$-43.50. Recommended minimum bankroll to withstand historical drawdowns: $-65.
🛡️ 1% Bankroll Rule Check: Professional risk sizing says no single draw should ever risk >1% of your bankroll.

⏱ Trailing window performance & consistency

How this strategy performed across each standard lookback window, plus profitable months out of the trailing 12. Compare short-term sweet spots against multi-year consistency.

1M 3M 6M 1Y ★ 2Y 3Y All Time Profitable Months
-$1.5
-100.0% ROI
-$9
-100.0% ROI
-$19
-100.0% ROI
-$43.5
-100.0% ROI
+$18.5
24.6% ROI
+$3.25
3.6% ROI
-$3.5
-3.6% ROI
0 / 12

📅 Year-by-year consistency breakdown

Annual profit & loss consistency across every calendar year in the archive.

YearCostGrossNet ProfitHitsROI
2023 $10.5 $0 -$10.5 0 -100.0%
2024 $19.75 $0 -$19.75 0 -100.0%
2025 $36.25 $93.75 +$57.5 1 158.6%
2026 $30.75 $0 -$30.75 0 -100.0%

📈 Monthly profit & loss history

25-10 $-1
25-11 $-8
25-12 $-4
26-01 $-7
26-02 $-4
26-03 $-2
26-04 $-3
26-05 $-3
26-06 $-5
26-07 $-3
26-08 $-5
26-09 $-2