Dashboard · Performance · Strategy Scouting Report
RB9 Math · Law of Large Numbers Deficit Hold (Top 1)
Dynamic Walk-Forward 477 total plays 0.9 families/draw
Mean-reversion hold: exploits root deficits predicted by the Law of Large Numbers (+3.93% All-Time ROI across 13,855 draws).
🧠 How this strategy works
Methodology & Selection Logic
Mean-reversion hold: exploits root deficits predicted by the Law of Large Numbers (+3.93% All-Time ROI across 13,855 draws).
Execution & Cost Profile
- Play Sizing: Averages 0.9 boxed families per drawing.
- Cost per Active Draw: ~$0.22 (0.9 × $0.25).
- Settlement: Every play is settled against actual historical drawings without lookahead bias.
- Trigger Behavior: Re-evaluated before every drawing based strictly on past occurrences.
🎯 Next draw plays — Midday · 09/07/2026
Active numbers in this hold cycle:
| Family | Type | Current Status | Selection Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| 027 | distinct | Hold Draw 10 of 10 | 2 drawn in sets: 2&6, 5&2, 7&2 (from 672 Evening 2026-09-03) · 7 pairs frequently with 5, 2, 0, 1 (from 672 Evening 2026-09-03) [RB9 Root 9 Aligned] · Hold Draw 10 of 10 (Stop-on-Drop for trigger 992) |
Quantitative Diagnostic: Severe Inefficiency: High ticket burn with weak conversion. Recommend switching to Top-1 chase or post-double regime.
| Dimension / Metric | Standard Baseline | ⚡ High-Efficiency Optimized | Variance & Capital Lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Plays Placed | 500 | 256 | -48.8% wagers eliminated |
| Winning Hits Captured | 2 | 1 | 50.0% hits retained |
| Hit Rate Efficiency | 0.40% | 0.39% | -0.01% |
| Capital Invested | $125.00 | $85.75 | +$61.00 saved |
| Net Profit / Loss | +$25.00 | -$10.75 | -$35.75 turnaround |
| Return on Investment (ROI) | 20.0% | -12.5% | -32.5% ROI Lift |
📊 Key performance metrics (6 months walk-forward)
Evaluated across 549 drawings (2026-03-08 → 2026-09-06). Multi-year consistency benchmark: +$323 (9.3% ROI across 13,860 all-time draws).
💼 Bankroll & Staking Simulator
Test how this strategy would have performed with different stake sizes and starting bankrolls, based on the actual historical walk-forward results.
⏱ Trailing window performance & consistency
How this strategy performed across each standard lookback window, plus profitable months out of the trailing 12. Compare short-term sweet spots against multi-year consistency.
| 1M | 3M | 6M | 1Y ★ | 2Y | 3Y | All Time | Profitable Months |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
-$4.5
-100.0% ROI |
-$51
-100.0% ROI |
-$119.25
-100.0% ROI |
-$30.75
-12.0% ROI |
+$220.5
41.6% ROI |
+$246
30.6% ROI |
+$322.5
9.3% ROI |
2 / 12 |
📅 Year-by-year consistency breakdown
Annual profit & loss consistency across every calendar year in the archive.
| Year | Cost | Gross | Net Profit | Hits | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | $86 | $0 | -$86 | 0 | -100.0% |
| 2011 | $180.75 | $187.5 | +$6.75 | 3 | 3.7% |
| 2012 | $181.75 | $75 | -$106.75 | 2 | -58.7% |
| 2013 | $182.25 | $300 | +$117.75 | 5 | 64.6% |
| 2014 | $182.5 | $37.5 | -$145 | 1 | -79.5% |
| 2015 | $182 | $37.5 | -$144.5 | 1 | -79.4% |
| 2016 | $183 | $150 | -$33 | 3 | -18.0% |
| 2017 | $182.5 | $187.5 | +$5 | 5 | 2.7% |
| 2018 | $182.5 | $225 | +$42.5 | 5 | 23.3% |
| 2019 | $182.5 | $75 | -$107.5 | 1 | -58.9% |
| 2020 | $183 | $337.5 | +$154.5 | 6 | 84.4% |
| 2021 | $273.75 | $487.5 | +$213.75 | 10 | 78.1% |
| 2022 | $273.75 | $412.5 | +$138.75 | 8 | 50.7% |
| 2023 | $273.75 | $225 | -$48.75 | 6 | -17.8% |
| 2024 | $274.5 | $375 | +$100.5 | 8 | 36.6% |
| 2025 | $273.75 | $675 | +$401.25 | 11 | 146.6% |
| 2026 | $186.75 | $0 | -$186.75 | 0 | -100.0% |