Dashboard · Performance · Strategy Scouting Report
RB9 Math · Law of Large Numbers Deficit Chase (Top 1)
Dynamic Walk-Forward 630 total plays 0.9 families/draw
Mean-reversion chase: exploits root deficits predicted by the Law of Large Numbers (+3.93% All-Time ROI across 13,855 draws).
🧠 How this strategy works
Methodology & Selection Logic
Mean-reversion chase: exploits root deficits predicted by the Law of Large Numbers (+3.93% All-Time ROI across 13,855 draws).
Execution & Cost Profile
- Play Sizing: Averages 0.9 boxed families per drawing.
- Cost per Active Draw: ~$0.23 (0.9 × $0.25).
- Settlement: Every play is settled against actual historical drawings without lookahead bias.
- Trigger Behavior: Re-evaluated before every drawing based strictly on past occurrences.
🎯 Next draw plays — Midday · 09/06/2026
Active numbers in this chase cycle:
| Family | Type | Current Status | Selection Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2378 | distinct | Draw 10 of 10 | 01 pair usually brings 32, 28 pairs (from 9160 Evening 2026-08-31) · 09: look for 78 or 38 pair (from 9160 Evening 2026-08-31) [RB9 Root 2 Aligned] · Chase Step 10 of 10 (Stop-on-Hit for trigger 1536) |
📊 Key performance metrics (1 year walk-forward)
Evaluated across 679 drawings (2025-09-05 → 2026-09-05). Multi-year consistency benchmark: $-15 (-2.7% ROI across 2,312 all-time draws).
💼 Bankroll & Staking Simulator
Test how this strategy would have performed with different stake sizes and starting bankrolls, based on the actual historical walk-forward results.
⏱ Trailing window performance & consistency
How this strategy performed across each standard lookback window, plus profitable months out of the trailing 12. Compare short-term sweet spots against multi-year consistency.
| 1M | 3M | 6M | 1Y ★ | 2Y | 3Y | All Time | Profitable Months |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
-$2.25
-100.0% ROI |
-$31
-100.0% ROI |
+$20.5
28.0% ROI |
-$63.75
-40.5% ROI |
-$45.5
-13.9% ROI |
-$121.25
-24.4% ROI |
-$15.5
-2.7% ROI |
1 / 12 |
📅 Year-by-year consistency breakdown
Annual profit & loss consistency across every calendar year in the archive.
| Year | Cost | Gross | Net Profit | Hits | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $124 | $187.5 | +$63.5 | 1 | 51.2% |
| 2024 | $169.75 | $281.25 | +$111.5 | 2 | 65.7% |
| 2025 | $169.25 | $0 | -$169.25 | 0 | -100.0% |
| 2026 | $115 | $93.75 | -$21.25 | 1 | -18.5% |
📈 Monthly profit & loss history
🎯 Historical chase hit distribution (Which draw do hits land on?)
1 Documented Hits in BacktestDistribution of winning hits across the 10-draw chase window. Shorter chases lock in higher net profit by minimizing wager accumulation.
💡 How to Read This Chart: In stop-on-hit chasing, every draw a number takes to hit costs an additional $0.25 per family. Hits landing on Draws 1 through 3 yield maximum profit margin ($35.00+ net on a $37.50 distinct payout). If a candidate reaches Draw 10 without hitting, the cycle expires to prevent runaway drawdown.
🏆 Most-hit families in this strategy
Families that generated the highest number of winning hits when played by this strategy.
🎯 Recent winning hits (last 1)
| Date | Draw | Number | Family | Pattern Type | Payout | Trigger Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-04 | Evening | 8630 | 0368 | distinct | +$93.75 | after 0: look for 24 or 63 pair (from 5085 Evening 2026-06-03) · 58: look for 78 and/or 30 pair (from 5085 Evening 2026-06-03) [RB9 Root 8 Aligned] · Chase Step 2 of 10 (Stop-on-Hit for trigger 5085) |