Dashboard · Performance · Strategy Scouting Report
RB9 Math · Law of Large Numbers Deficit Hold (Top 1)
Dynamic Walk-Forward 70 total plays 0.8 families/draw
Mean-reversion hold: exploits root deficits predicted by the Law of Large Numbers (+3.93% All-Time ROI across 13,855 draws).
🧠 How this strategy works
Methodology & Selection Logic
Mean-reversion hold: exploits root deficits predicted by the Law of Large Numbers (+3.93% All-Time ROI across 13,855 draws).
Execution & Cost Profile
- Play Sizing: Averages 0.8 boxed families per drawing.
- Cost per Active Draw: ~$0.19 (0.8 × $0.25).
- Settlement: Every play is settled against actual historical drawings without lookahead bias.
- Trigger Behavior: Re-evaluated before every drawing based strictly on past occurrences.
🎯 Next draw plays — Midday · 09/11/2026
Active numbers in this hold cycle:
| Family | Type | Current Status | Selection Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | double | Hold Draw 10 of 10 | 7 pairs frequently with 5, 2, 0, 1 (from 917 Evening 2026-08-31) · 7 pairs frequently with 5, 2, 0, 1 (from 478 Evening 2026-08-30) [RB9 Root 7 Aligned] · Hold Draw 10 of 10 (Stop-on-Drop for trigger 310) |
Quantitative Diagnostic: High Efficiency: Strong ROI lift with significant ticket cost reduction.
| Dimension / Metric | Standard Baseline | ⚡ High-Efficiency Optimized | Variance & Capital Lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Plays Placed | 500 | 298 | -40.4% wagers eliminated |
| Winning Hits Captured | 1 | 1 | 100.0% hits retained |
| Hit Rate Efficiency | 0.20% | 0.34% | +0.14% |
| Capital Invested | $125.00 | $99.50 | +$50.50 saved |
| Net Profit / Loss | -$87.50 | -$24.50 | +$63.00 turnaround |
| Return on Investment (ROI) | -70.0% | -24.6% | +45.4% ROI Lift |
📊 Key performance metrics (3 months walk-forward)
Evaluated across 92 drawings (2026-06-11 → 2026-09-08). Multi-year consistency benchmark: +$8 (2.8% ROI across 1,167 all-time draws).
💼 Bankroll & Staking Simulator
Test how this strategy would have performed with different stake sizes and starting bankrolls, based on the actual historical walk-forward results.
⏱ Trailing window performance & consistency
How this strategy performed across each standard lookback window, plus profitable months out of the trailing 12. Compare short-term sweet spots against multi-year consistency.
| 1M | 3M | 6M | 1Y ★ | 2Y | 3Y | All Time | Profitable Months |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
-$2
-100.0% ROI |
-$17.5
-100.0% ROI |
-$40.25
-100.0% ROI |
-$85.75
-100.0% ROI |
-$102
-57.6% ROI |
-$43.5
-16.2% ROI |
+$8.25
2.8% ROI |
0 / 12 |
📅 Year-by-year consistency breakdown
Annual profit & loss consistency across every calendar year in the archive.
| Year | Cost | Gross | Net Profit | Hits | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $46.25 | $112.5 | +$66.25 | 3 | 143.2% |
| 2024 | $91.5 | $150 | +$58.5 | 4 | 63.9% |
| 2025 | $91.25 | $37.5 | -$53.75 | 1 | -58.9% |
| 2026 | $62.75 | $0 | -$62.75 | 0 | -100.0% |