Dashboard · Performance · Strategy Scouting Report

Cici's Above-50% Rules Engine

Dynamic Walk-Forward 1,288 total plays 7.0 families/draw

Switch Strategy:

Evaluates all Cici rules with verified >= 50% claim-window accuracy using Hierarchical Preemption (prioritizes High-Accuracy interlocks in top slots, guaranteeing 505 and 783).

Time Window: 6 months ★ 1 year (Sweet Spot) 2 years 3 years 5 years All time (Full History) · 1m 3m

Draw Time: All Draws ☀️ Midday 🌆 Evening

🧠 How this strategy works

Methodology & Selection Logic

Evaluates all Cici rules with verified >= 50% claim-window accuracy using Hierarchical Preemption (prioritizes High-Accuracy interlocks in top slots, guaranteeing 505 and 783).

Execution & Cost Profile

Play Sizing: Averages 7.0 boxed families per drawing.
Cost per Active Draw: ~$1.76 (7.0 × $0.25).
Settlement: Every play is settled against actual historical drawings without lookahead bias.
Trigger Behavior: Re-evaluated before every drawing based strictly on past occurrences.

🎯 Next draw plays — Midday · 09/11/2026

Playing 8 families for $2.00 total stake.

367 distinct 237 distinct 377 double 347 distinct 036 distinct 346 distinct 236 distinct 369 distinct

Family	Type	Selection Reason
367	distinct	56 brings digit 3 and/or pair 37 (from 650 Evening 2026-09-08)
237	distinct	56 brings digit 3 and/or pair 37 (from 650 Evening 2026-09-08)
377	double	56 brings digit 3 and/or pair 37 (from 650 Evening 2026-09-08)
347	distinct	56 brings digit 3 and/or pair 37 (from 650 Evening 2026-09-08)
036	distinct	after 0: look for 24 or 63 pair (from 650 Evening 2026-09-08)
346	distinct	after 0: look for 24 or 63 pair (from 650 Evening 2026-09-08)
236	distinct	2 drawn in sets: 2&6, 5&2, 7&2 (from 128 Evening 2026-09-10)
369	distinct	23 brings 23 and 69 complements (from 322 Evening 2026-09-09)

⚡ STRATEGY EFFICIENCY & CAPITAL OPTIMIZATION TERMINAL Efficiency Grade: F Archetype: BLOATED BASKET

Ticket Waste Index: 87.6%

Quantitative Diagnostic: Severe Inefficiency: High ticket burn with weak conversion. Recommend switching to Top-1 chase or post-double regime.

Dimension / Metric	Standard Baseline	⚡ High-Efficiency Optimized	Variance & Capital Lift
Total Plays Placed	4,000	321	-92.0% wagers eliminated
Winning Hits Captured	11	1	9.1% hits retained
Hit Rate Efficiency	0.27%	0.31%	+0.04%
Capital Invested	$1000.00	$107.25	+$892.75 saved
Net Profit / Loss	-$475.00	-$69.75	+$405.25 turnaround
Return on Investment (ROI)	-47.5%	-65.0%	-17.5% ROI Lift

🛡️ Tailored Optimization Rules Applied to this Model

Top-K Concentration: Capped at top lines to eliminate dilution

Anti-Repeat Shield: 15-draw trailing blackout (< 0.08% repeat rate)

Wave Sizing & Trough Protection: $0.50 Wave 1 / $0.00 Dead Zone (Draws 4–6)

Draw 10 Zero Exposure Mandate: 🛑 $0.00 Sit Out on Step 10 (Terminal Hard-Stop)

📊 Key performance metrics (6 months walk-forward)

⚡ Recent Form Window

Evaluated across 183 drawings (2026-03-12 → 2026-09-08). Multi-year consistency benchmark: $-496 (-21.3% ROI across 1,167 all-time draws).

Net Profit -$172

Return on Investment -53.4%

Hit Rate 0.23%

Max Drawdown -$-172

Active Drawings 183

Total Plays Placed 1,288

Total Winning Hits 3

Gross Revenue $150

💰 Audited Prize Payouts & Hits by Pattern Kind Dynamic Accounting: Doubles pay 2× ($75.00) · Triples pay 6× ($225.00)

distinct Base ($37.50)

2 hits

+$75

double 2x Double ($75.00)

1 hits

+$75

💼 Bankroll & Staking Simulator

Test how this strategy would have performed with different stake sizes and starting bankrolls, based on the actual historical walk-forward results.

Stake per family per drawing:

Starting Bankroll ($):

Total Staked (Cost) $322

Total Payout (Gross) $150

Net Profit / Loss -$172

Final Bankroll $328

Max historical drawdown scaled to selected stake: -$-172.00. Recommended minimum bankroll to withstand historical drawdowns: $-258.

🛡️ 1% Bankroll Rule Check: Professional risk sizing says no single draw should ever risk >1% of your bankroll.

⏱ Trailing window performance & consistency

How this strategy performed across each standard lookback window, plus profitable months out of the trailing 12. Compare short-term sweet spots against multi-year consistency.

1M	3M	6M	1Y ★	2Y	3Y	All Time	Profitable Months
-$16 -100.0% ROI	-$140 -100.0% ROI	-$172 -53.4% ROI	-$311 -45.3% ROI	-$628.5 -44.4% ROI	-$423 -19.7% ROI	-$496.5 -21.3% ROI	2 / 12

📅 Year-by-year consistency breakdown

Annual profit & loss consistency across every calendar year in the archive.

Year	Cost	Gross	Net Profit	Hits	ROI
2023	$370	$187.5	-$182.5	5	-49.3%
2024	$732	$1,087.5	+$355.5	21	48.6%
2025	$730	$337.5	-$392.5	7	-53.8%
2026	$502	$225	-$277	5	-55.2%

📈 Monthly profit & loss history

26-04 $-60

26-05 $51

26-06 $-23

26-07 $-62

26-08 $-62

26-09 $-16

🏆 Most-hit families in this strategy

Families that generated the highest number of winning hits when played by this strategy.

077 1 hits 167 1 hits 469 1 hits

🎯 Recent winning hits (last 3)

Date	Draw	Number	Family	Pattern Type	Payout	Trigger Reason
2026-06-20	Evening	964	469	distinct	+$37.50	23 brings 23 and 69 complements (from 372 Evening 2026-06-19)
2026-05-25	Evening	770	077	double 2x Double	+$75.00	7 pairs frequently with 5, 2, 0, 1 (from 487 Evening 2026-05-24)
2026-05-18	Evening	167	167	distinct	+$37.50	1 usually brings 7 or 4; 7&1 / 4&1 together (from 123 Evening 2026-05-16)