Dashboard · Performance · Strategy Scouting Report
Cici Confluence Engine (Top 5 Flat)
Dynamic Walk-Forward 40 total plays 1.3 families/draw
Multi-rule confluence engine: wagers on top 5 candidate families supported by multiple machine rules with >=15-draw quarantine.
🧠 How this strategy works
Methodology & Selection Logic
Multi-rule confluence engine: wagers on top 5 candidate families supported by multiple machine rules with >=15-draw quarantine.
Execution & Cost Profile
- Play Sizing: Averages 1.3 boxed families per drawing.
- Cost per Active Draw: ~$0.32 (1.3 × $0.25).
- Settlement: Every play is settled against actual historical drawings without lookahead bias.
- Trigger Behavior: Re-evaluated before every drawing based strictly on past occurrences.
🎯 Next draw plays — Midday · 09/11/2026
Playing 5 families for $1.25 total stake.
| Family | Type | Selection Reason |
|---|---|---|
| 367 | distinct | after 0: look for 24 or 63 pair (from 650 Evening 2026-09-08) |
| 236 | distinct | 2 drawn in sets: 2&6, 5&2, 7&2 (from 128 Evening 2026-09-10) |
| 234 | distinct | 23 brings 23 and 69 complements (from 322 Evening 2026-09-09) |
| 346 | distinct | after 0: look for 24 or 63 pair (from 650 Evening 2026-09-08) |
| 237 | distinct | 2 drawn in sets: 2&6, 5&2, 7&2 (from 128 Evening 2026-09-10) |
Quantitative Diagnostic: Severe Inefficiency: High ticket burn with weak conversion. Recommend switching to Top-1 chase or post-double regime.
| Dimension / Metric | Standard Baseline | ⚡ High-Efficiency Optimized | Variance & Capital Lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Plays Placed | 2,500 | 837 | -66.5% wagers eliminated |
| Winning Hits Captured | 6 | 1 | 16.7% hits retained |
| Hit Rate Efficiency | 0.24% | 0.12% | -0.12% |
| Capital Invested | $625.00 | $279.00 | +$369.25 saved |
| Net Profit / Loss | -$325.00 | -$241.50 | +$83.50 turnaround |
| Return on Investment (ROI) | -52.0% | -86.6% | -34.6% ROI Lift |
📊 Key performance metrics (1 month walk-forward)
Evaluated across 31 drawings (2026-08-11 → 2026-09-08). Multi-year consistency benchmark: $-521 (-35.7% ROI across 1,167 all-time draws).
💼 Bankroll & Staking Simulator
Test how this strategy would have performed with different stake sizes and starting bankrolls, based on the actual historical walk-forward results.
⏱ Trailing window performance & consistency
How this strategy performed across each standard lookback window, plus profitable months out of the trailing 12. Compare short-term sweet spots against multi-year consistency.
| 1M | 3M | 6M | 1Y ★ | 2Y | 3Y | All Time | Profitable Months |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
-$10
-100.0% ROI |
-$12.5
-14.3% ROI |
-$13.75
-6.8% ROI |
-$166.25
-38.8% ROI |
-$472.5
-53.4% ROI |
-$480
-35.8% ROI |
-$521.25
-35.7% ROI |
3 / 12 |
📅 Year-by-year consistency breakdown
Annual profit & loss consistency across every calendar year in the archive.
| Year | Cost | Gross | Net Profit | Hits | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $231.25 | $112.5 | -$118.75 | 3 | -51.4% |
| 2024 | $457.5 | $525 | +$67.5 | 11 | 14.8% |
| 2025 | $456.25 | $37.5 | -$418.75 | 1 | -91.8% |
| 2026 | $313.75 | $262.5 | -$51.25 | 5 | -16.3% |