Dashboard · Performance · Strategy Scouting Report
Cici Confluence Engine (Top 5 Flat)
Dynamic Walk-Forward 350 total plays 3.8 families/draw
Multi-rule confluence engine: wagers on top 5 candidate families supported by multiple machine rules with >=15-draw quarantine.
🧠 How this strategy works
Methodology & Selection Logic
Multi-rule confluence engine: wagers on top 5 candidate families supported by multiple machine rules with >=15-draw quarantine.
Execution & Cost Profile
- Play Sizing: Averages 3.8 boxed families per drawing.
- Cost per Active Draw: ~$0.95 (3.8 × $0.25).
- Settlement: Every play is settled against actual historical drawings without lookahead bias.
- Trigger Behavior: Re-evaluated before every drawing based strictly on past occurrences.
🎯 Next draw plays — Evening · 09/12/2026
Playing 5 families for $1.25 total stake.
| Family | Type | Selection Reason |
|---|---|---|
| 337 | double | pairs after 00: fall next draw or draw after (from 001 Evening 2026-09-10) |
| 377 | double | 56 brings digit 3 and/or pair 37 (from 756 Evening 2026-09-09) |
| 367 | distinct | pairs after 00: fall next draw or draw after (from 001 Evening 2026-09-10) |
| 237 | distinct | pairs after 00: fall next draw or draw after (from 001 Evening 2026-09-10) |
| 037 | distinct | 56 brings digit 3 and/or pair 37 (from 756 Evening 2026-09-09) |
Quantitative Diagnostic: High Efficiency: Strong ROI lift with significant ticket cost reduction.
| Dimension / Metric | Standard Baseline | ⚡ High-Efficiency Optimized | Variance & Capital Lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Plays Placed | 2,500 | 117 | -95.3% wagers eliminated |
| Winning Hits Captured | 8 | 2 | 25.0% hits retained |
| Hit Rate Efficiency | 0.32% | 1.71% | +1.39% |
| Capital Invested | $625.00 | $40.50 | +$588.25 saved |
| Net Profit / Loss | -$175.00 | +$72.00 | +$247.00 turnaround |
| Return on Investment (ROI) | -28.0% | 177.8% | +205.8% ROI Lift |
📊 Key performance metrics (3 months walk-forward)
Evaluated across 92 drawings (2026-06-12 → 2026-09-08). Multi-year consistency benchmark: $-446 (-30.6% ROI across 1,167 all-time draws).
💼 Bankroll & Staking Simulator
Test how this strategy would have performed with different stake sizes and starting bankrolls, based on the actual historical walk-forward results.
⏱ Trailing window performance & consistency
How this strategy performed across each standard lookback window, plus profitable months out of the trailing 12. Compare short-term sweet spots against multi-year consistency.
| 1M | 3M | 6M | 1Y ★ | 2Y | 3Y | All Time | Profitable Months |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
-$10
-100.0% ROI |
-$87.5
-100.0% ROI |
-$88.75
-44.1% ROI |
-$278.75
-65.0% ROI |
-$172.5
-19.5% ROI |
-$367.5
-27.4% ROI |
-$446.25
-30.6% ROI |
1 / 12 |
📅 Year-by-year consistency breakdown
Annual profit & loss consistency across every calendar year in the archive.
| Year | Cost | Gross | Net Profit | Hits | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $231.25 | $75 | -$156.25 | 2 | -67.6% |
| 2024 | $457.5 | $337.5 | -$120 | 7 | -26.2% |
| 2025 | $456.25 | $487.5 | +$31.25 | 9 | 6.8% |
| 2026 | $313.75 | $112.5 | -$201.25 | 2 | -64.1% |