Dashboard · Performance · Strategy Scouting Report
RB9 Math · Law of Large Numbers Deficit Hold (Top 1)
Dynamic Walk-Forward 16 total plays 0.3 families/draw
Mean-reversion hold: exploits root deficits predicted by the Law of Large Numbers (+3.93% All-Time ROI across 13,855 draws).
🧠 How this strategy works
Methodology & Selection Logic
Mean-reversion hold: exploits root deficits predicted by the Law of Large Numbers (+3.93% All-Time ROI across 13,855 draws).
Execution & Cost Profile
- Play Sizing: Averages 0.3 boxed families per drawing.
- Cost per Active Draw: ~$0.06 (0.3 × $0.25).
- Settlement: Every play is settled against actual historical drawings without lookahead bias.
- Trigger Behavior: Re-evaluated before every drawing based strictly on past occurrences.
🎯 Next draw plays — Midday · 09/11/2026
Active numbers in this hold cycle:
| Family | Type | Current Status | Selection Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| 355 | double | Hold Draw 10 of 10 | 66 brings 35, 38, 58 (from 663 Evening 2026-09-03) · 54, 55, 60 directly follow each other (from 460 Evening 2026-09-02) [RB9 Root 4 Aligned] · Hold Draw 10 of 10 (Stop-on-Drop for trigger 969) |
Quantitative Diagnostic: High Efficiency: Strong ROI lift with significant ticket cost reduction.
| Dimension / Metric | Standard Baseline | ⚡ High-Efficiency Optimized | Variance & Capital Lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Plays Placed | 500 | 58 | -88.4% wagers eliminated |
| Winning Hits Captured | 3 | 1 | 33.3% hits retained |
| Hit Rate Efficiency | 0.60% | 1.72% | +1.12% |
| Capital Invested | $125.00 | $19.00 | +$110.50 saved |
| Net Profit / Loss | +$25.00 | +$18.50 | -$6.50 turnaround |
| Return on Investment (ROI) | 20.0% | 97.4% | +77.4% ROI Lift |
📊 Key performance metrics (1 month walk-forward)
Evaluated across 62 drawings (2026-08-09 → 2026-09-08). Multi-year consistency benchmark: +$84 (13.4% ROI across 2,514 all-time draws).
💼 Bankroll & Staking Simulator
Test how this strategy would have performed with different stake sizes and starting bankrolls, based on the actual historical walk-forward results.
⏱ Trailing window performance & consistency
How this strategy performed across each standard lookback window, plus profitable months out of the trailing 12. Compare short-term sweet spots against multi-year consistency.
| 1M | 3M | 6M | 1Y ★ | 2Y | 3Y | All Time | Profitable Months |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
-$4
-100.0% ROI |
-$35
-100.0% ROI |
+$32
39.8% ROI |
+$91
53.1% ROI |
+$58.5
16.5% ROI |
+$63
11.7% ROI |
+$84
13.4% ROI |
5 / 12 |
📅 Year-by-year consistency breakdown
Annual profit & loss consistency across every calendar year in the archive.
| Year | Cost | Gross | Net Profit | Hits | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $137.5 | $112.5 | -$25 | 2 | -18.2% |
| 2024 | $183 | $262.5 | +$79.5 | 5 | 43.4% |
| 2025 | $182.5 | $112.5 | -$70 | 3 | -38.4% |
| 2026 | $125.5 | $225 | +$99.5 | 4 | 79.3% |