Dashboard · Performance · Strategy Scouting Report
RB9 Math · Law of Large Numbers Deficit Hold (Top 1)
Dynamic Walk-Forward 15 total plays 0.3 families/draw
Mean-reversion hold: exploits root deficits predicted by the Law of Large Numbers (+3.93% All-Time ROI across 13,855 draws).
🧠 How this strategy works
Methodology & Selection Logic
Mean-reversion hold: exploits root deficits predicted by the Law of Large Numbers (+3.93% All-Time ROI across 13,855 draws).
Execution & Cost Profile
- Play Sizing: Averages 0.3 boxed families per drawing.
- Cost per Active Draw: ~$0.06 (0.3 × $0.25).
- Settlement: Every play is settled against actual historical drawings without lookahead bias.
- Trigger Behavior: Re-evaluated before every drawing based strictly on past occurrences.
🎯 Next draw plays — Midday · 09/13/2026
Active numbers in this hold cycle:
| Family | Type | Current Status | Selection Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| 234 | distinct | Hold Draw 10 of 10 | 01 pair usually brings 32, 28 pairs (from 601 Evening 2026-09-04) · after 0: look for 24 or 63 pair (from 601 Evening 2026-09-04) · Hold Draw 10 of 10 (Stop-on-Drop for trigger 557) |
Quantitative Diagnostic: High Efficiency: Strong ROI lift with significant ticket cost reduction.
| Dimension / Metric | Standard Baseline | ⚡ High-Efficiency Optimized | Variance & Capital Lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Plays Placed | 500 | 141 | -71.8% wagers eliminated |
| Winning Hits Captured | 3 | 1 | 33.3% hits retained |
| Hit Rate Efficiency | 0.60% | 0.71% | +0.11% |
| Capital Invested | $125.00 | $47.25 | +$89.75 saved |
| Net Profit / Loss | -$12.50 | +$27.75 | +$40.25 turnaround |
| Return on Investment (ROI) | -10.0% | 58.7% | +68.7% ROI Lift |
📊 Key performance metrics (1 month walk-forward)
Evaluated across 60 drawings (2026-08-11 → 2026-09-08). Multi-year consistency benchmark: $-178 (-28.4% ROI across 2,513 all-time draws).
💼 Bankroll & Staking Simulator
Test how this strategy would have performed with different stake sizes and starting bankrolls, based on the actual historical walk-forward results.
⏱ Trailing window performance & consistency
How this strategy performed across each standard lookback window, plus profitable months out of the trailing 12. Compare short-term sweet spots against multi-year consistency.
| 1M | 3M | 6M | 1Y ★ | 2Y | 3Y | All Time | Profitable Months |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
-$3.75
-100.0% ROI |
+$40.25
115.8% ROI |
-$5.25
-6.5% ROI |
+$16.25
9.5% ROI |
-$91.25
-25.8% ROI |
-$124.25
-23.1% ROI |
-$178.25
-28.4% ROI |
3 / 12 |
📅 Year-by-year consistency breakdown
Annual profit & loss consistency across every calendar year in the archive.
| Year | Cost | Gross | Net Profit | Hits | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $137.5 | $112.5 | -$25 | 2 | -18.2% |
| 2024 | $183 | $150 | -$33 | 2 | -18.0% |
| 2025 | $182.5 | $37.5 | -$145 | 1 | -79.5% |
| 2026 | $125.25 | $150 | +$24.75 | 2 | 19.8% |