Dashboard · Performance · Strategy Scouting Report
Cici's Dual-Core Sniper (5-Draw Stop-on-Drop Hold)
Dynamic Walk-Forward 140 total plays 0.8 families/draw
Disciplined 5-draw hold with immediate early-exit on drop: wagers on top Dual-Core sniper candidate for up to 5 draws, stopping immediately upon realizing a drop to lock in net profit (+39.5% ROI in Cash 4).
🧠 How this strategy works
Methodology & Selection Logic
Disciplined 5-draw hold with immediate early-exit on drop: wagers on top Dual-Core sniper candidate for up to 5 draws, stopping immediately upon realizing a drop to lock in net profit (+39.5% ROI in Cash 4).
Execution & Cost Profile
- Play Sizing: Averages 0.8 boxed families per drawing.
- Cost per Active Draw: ~$0.19 (0.8 × $0.25).
- Settlement: Every play is settled against actual historical drawings without lookahead bias.
- Trigger Behavior: Re-evaluated before every drawing based strictly on past occurrences.
🎯 Next draw plays — Midday · 09/13/2026
Active numbers in this hold cycle:
| Family | Type | Current Status | Selection Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| 134 | distinct | Hold Draw 5 of 5 | 1 usually brings 7 or 4; 7&1 / 4&1 together (from 816 Midday 2026-09-08) · Hold Draw 5 of 5 (Stop-on-Drop for trigger 140) |
Quantitative Diagnostic: High Efficiency: Strong ROI lift with significant ticket cost reduction.
| Dimension / Metric | Standard Baseline | ⚡ High-Efficiency Optimized | Variance & Capital Lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Plays Placed | 500 | 24 | -95.2% wagers eliminated |
| Winning Hits Captured | 1 | 1 | 100.0% hits retained |
| Hit Rate Efficiency | 0.20% | 4.17% | +3.97% |
| Capital Invested | $125.00 | $7.75 | +$119.00 saved |
| Net Profit / Loss | -$87.50 | +$29.75 | +$117.25 turnaround |
| Return on Investment (ROI) | -70.0% | 383.9% | +453.9% ROI Lift |
📊 Key performance metrics (3 months walk-forward)
Evaluated across 180 drawings (2026-06-13 → 2026-09-08). Multi-year consistency benchmark: +$123 (19.6% ROI across 2,508 all-time draws).
💼 Bankroll & Staking Simulator
Test how this strategy would have performed with different stake sizes and starting bankrolls, based on the actual historical walk-forward results.
⏱ Trailing window performance & consistency
How this strategy performed across each standard lookback window, plus profitable months out of the trailing 12. Compare short-term sweet spots against multi-year consistency.
| 1M | 3M | 6M | 1Y ★ | 2Y | 3Y | All Time | Profitable Months |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
-$4
-100.0% ROI |
-$35
-100.0% ROI |
-$80.5
-100.0% ROI |
-$21
-12.3% ROI |
+$22
6.2% ROI |
+$64.5
12.0% ROI |
+$123
19.6% ROI |
3 / 12 |
📅 Year-by-year consistency breakdown
Annual profit & loss consistency across every calendar year in the archive.
| Year | Cost | Gross | Net Profit | Hits | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $137 | $300 | +$163 | 7 | 119.0% |
| 2024 | $182.5 | $187.5 | +$5 | 4 | 2.7% |
| 2025 | $182 | $225 | +$43 | 6 | 23.6% |
| 2026 | $125.5 | $37.5 | -$88 | 1 | -70.1% |